|
|
| Acceso al texto completo restringido a Biblioteca INIA La Estanzuela. Por información adicional contacte bib_le@inia.org.uy. |
Registro completo
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA La Estanzuela. |
Fecha : |
02/04/2020 |
Actualizado : |
24/02/2022 |
Tipo de producción científica : |
Capítulo en Libro Técnico-Científico |
Autor : |
HELGUERA, M.; ABUGALIEVA, A.; BATTENFIELD, S.; BÉKÉS, F.; BRANLARD, G.; CUNIBERTI, M.; HÜSKEN,A.; JOHANSSON, E.; MORRIS, C.F.; NURIT, E.; SISSONS, M.; VÁZQUEZ, D. |
Afiliación : |
MARCELO HELGUERA, National Institute of Agricultural Technology (INTA), Marcos Juárez, Argentina .; AIGUL ABUGALIEVA, Kazakh Scientific Research Institute of Agriculture and Plant Growing, Almalybak, Kazakhstan.; SARAH BATTENFIELD, Syngenta, Junction City, KS, USA.; FERENC BÉKÉS, FBFD PTY LTD, Sydney, NSW, Australia.; GÉRARD BRANLARD, INRAE, UCA UMR1095 GDEC, Clermont-Ferrand, France.; MARTHA CUNIBERTI, Wheat and Soybean Quality Laboratory, National Institute of Agricultural Technology (INTA), Buenos Aires, Argentina.; ALEXANDRA HÜSKEN, Department of Safety and Quality of CerealsMax Rubner-Institut, Federal Research Institute of Nutrition and Food Detmold, Germany.; EVA JOHANSSON, Department of Plant Breeding The Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Alnarp, Sweden.; CRAIG F. MORRIS, Western Wheat Quality LaboratoryUSDA-ARS,Pullman,USA.; ERIC NURIT, Mazan,France.; MIKE SISSONS, NSW Department of Primary Industries Tamworth Centre for Crop Improvement Calala, Australia.; DANIEL VÁZQUEZ PEYRONEL, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay. |
Título : |
Grain Quality in Breeding. |
Fecha de publicación : |
2020 |
Fuente / Imprenta : |
In: Igrejas G., Ikeda T., Guzmán C. (eds). Wheat Quality For Improving Processing And Human Health. Cham:Springer. Doi:
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-34163-3_12 |
Páginas : |
p. 273-307. |
Idioma : |
Inglés |
Notas : |
Article history:First Online: 18 March 2020. |
Contenido : |
Abstract:
Technological (processing performance and end-product) and nutritional quality of wheat is in principle determined by a number of compounds within the wheat grain, including proteins, polysaccharides, lipids, minerals, heavy metals, vitamins and phytochemicals, effecting these characters. The genotype and environment is of similar importance for the determination of the content and composition of these compounds. Furthermore, the interaction between genotypes and the cultivation environment may play a significant role. Many studies have evaluated whether the genotype or the environment plays the major role in determining the content of the mentioned compounds. An overall conclusion of these studies is that except for compounds encoded by single major genes, importance of certain factors mainly depend on how wide environments and how diverse cultivars are within these comparative studies. Comparing environments all over, e.g. across Latin America, ends up with a high significance of the environment while large studies including genotypes of wide genetic background result in a significant role for the genotype. In addition, for some technological properties and components, genotype has a higher effect (e.g. grain hardness and gluten proteins), while environment influences stronger on others (e.g. protein and mineral content).Content and concentration of proteins, but also to some extent of starch, some non-starch polysaccharides and lipids, are essential in determining the technological quality of a wheat flour. For nutritional quality of the flour, the majority of the compounds are together the important determinant. Thus an increased understanding of environmental effects is essential. As to how the environment is influencing the content of the compounds, there are some differences. The protein content and composition is strongly affected by environmental factors influencing nitrogen availability and cultivar development time. However, these two factors are impacted by a range of environmental (temperature, precipitation, humidity/sun hours, etc.) and agronomic (soil properties, crop management practices such as seeding density, nitrogen fertilizer application timing and amount, etc.) components. Thus, to understand the interplay between the various environmental and agronomic factors impacting the technological quality of a wheat flour, modeling is a useful tool. Several other compounds, including minerals and heavy metals, are to a higher extent determined by site specific variation, resulting in similar rankings of entries across locations, although the total content is varying among years. The bioactive compounds and vitamins are a part of the defense mechanisms of plants and thus there is a variation in these compounds depending on prevailing biotic and abiotic stresses (heat, drought, excess rainfall, nutrition, diseases and pests). Thus, even for nutritional quality of wheat, incorporating all compounds of relevance in the evaluation would benefit from modeling tools. MenosAbstract:
Technological (processing performance and end-product) and nutritional quality of wheat is in principle determined by a number of compounds within the wheat grain, including proteins, polysaccharides, lipids, minerals, heavy metals, vitamins and phytochemicals, effecting these characters. The genotype and environment is of similar importance for the determination of the content and composition of these compounds. Furthermore, the interaction between genotypes and the cultivation environment may play a significant role. Many studies have evaluated whether the genotype or the environment plays the major role in determining the content of the mentioned compounds. An overall conclusion of these studies is that except for compounds encoded by single major genes, importance of certain factors mainly depend on how wide environments and how diverse cultivars are within these comparative studies. Comparing environments all over, e.g. across Latin America, ends up with a high significance of the environment while large studies including genotypes of wide genetic background result in a significant role for the genotype. In addition, for some technological properties and components, genotype has a higher effect (e.g. grain hardness and gluten proteins), while environment influences stronger on others (e.g. protein and mineral content).Content and concentration of proteins, but also to some extent of starch, some non-starch polysaccharides and lipids, are essential in determini... Presentar Todo |
Palabras claves : |
CASE-STUDIES; DURUM-WHEAT; NUTRITIONAL-QUALITY; PLATAFORMA AGROALIMENTOS; QUALITY-SELECTION; SOFT-WHEAT; WILD-RELATIVES. |
Thesagro : |
TRIGO. |
Asunto categoría : |
F30 Genética vegetal y fitomejoramiento |
Marc : |
LEADER 04132naa a2200373 a 4500 001 1060983 005 2022-02-24 008 2020 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 100 1 $aHELGUERA, M. 245 $aGrain Quality in Breeding.$h[electronic resource] 260 $c2020 300 $ap. 273-307. 500 $aArticle history:First Online: 18 March 2020. 520 $aAbstract: Technological (processing performance and end-product) and nutritional quality of wheat is in principle determined by a number of compounds within the wheat grain, including proteins, polysaccharides, lipids, minerals, heavy metals, vitamins and phytochemicals, effecting these characters. The genotype and environment is of similar importance for the determination of the content and composition of these compounds. Furthermore, the interaction between genotypes and the cultivation environment may play a significant role. Many studies have evaluated whether the genotype or the environment plays the major role in determining the content of the mentioned compounds. An overall conclusion of these studies is that except for compounds encoded by single major genes, importance of certain factors mainly depend on how wide environments and how diverse cultivars are within these comparative studies. Comparing environments all over, e.g. across Latin America, ends up with a high significance of the environment while large studies including genotypes of wide genetic background result in a significant role for the genotype. In addition, for some technological properties and components, genotype has a higher effect (e.g. grain hardness and gluten proteins), while environment influences stronger on others (e.g. protein and mineral content).Content and concentration of proteins, but also to some extent of starch, some non-starch polysaccharides and lipids, are essential in determining the technological quality of a wheat flour. For nutritional quality of the flour, the majority of the compounds are together the important determinant. Thus an increased understanding of environmental effects is essential. As to how the environment is influencing the content of the compounds, there are some differences. The protein content and composition is strongly affected by environmental factors influencing nitrogen availability and cultivar development time. However, these two factors are impacted by a range of environmental (temperature, precipitation, humidity/sun hours, etc.) and agronomic (soil properties, crop management practices such as seeding density, nitrogen fertilizer application timing and amount, etc.) components. Thus, to understand the interplay between the various environmental and agronomic factors impacting the technological quality of a wheat flour, modeling is a useful tool. Several other compounds, including minerals and heavy metals, are to a higher extent determined by site specific variation, resulting in similar rankings of entries across locations, although the total content is varying among years. The bioactive compounds and vitamins are a part of the defense mechanisms of plants and thus there is a variation in these compounds depending on prevailing biotic and abiotic stresses (heat, drought, excess rainfall, nutrition, diseases and pests). Thus, even for nutritional quality of wheat, incorporating all compounds of relevance in the evaluation would benefit from modeling tools. 650 $aTRIGO 653 $aCASE-STUDIES 653 $aDURUM-WHEAT 653 $aNUTRITIONAL-QUALITY 653 $aPLATAFORMA AGROALIMENTOS 653 $aQUALITY-SELECTION 653 $aSOFT-WHEAT 653 $aWILD-RELATIVES 700 1 $aABUGALIEVA, A. 700 1 $aBATTENFIELD, S. 700 1 $aBÉKÉS, F. 700 1 $aBRANLARD, G. 700 1 $aCUNIBERTI, M. 700 1 $aHÜSKEN,A. 700 1 $aJOHANSSON, E. 700 1 $aMORRIS, C.F. 700 1 $aNURIT, E. 700 1 $aSISSONS, M. 700 1 $aVÁZQUEZ, D. 773 $tIn: Igrejas G., Ikeda T., Guzmán C. (eds). Wheat Quality For Improving Processing And Human Health. Cham:Springer. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-34163-3_12
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
Registro original : |
INIA La Estanzuela (LE) |
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
|
Registro completo
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Tacuarembó; INIA Treinta y Tres. |
Fecha actual : |
13/08/2015 |
Actualizado : |
10/03/2021 |
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Nacionales |
Circulación / Nivel : |
Nacional - -- |
Autor : |
BONILLA, C.; TERRA, J.A.; GUTIERREZ, L.; ROEL, A. |
Afiliación : |
CAMILA MARIA BONILLA CEDRES; JOSE ALFREDO TERRA FERNANDEZ, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; LUCÍA GUTIERREZ, FACULTAD DE AGRONOMÍA, UNIVERSIDAD DE LA REPÚBLICA, URUGUAY; ALVARO ROEL DELLAZOPPA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay. |
Título : |
Cosechando los beneficios de la agricultura de precisión en un cultivo de arroz en Uruguay. (Harvesting the Benefits of Precision Agriculture in an Uruguayan Rice Crop) |
Fecha de publicación : |
2015 |
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Agrociencia Uruguay, 2015, v.19, no.1, p. 112-121. |
ISSN : |
1510-0830 |
Idioma : |
Español |
Notas : |
Historia del artículo: Recibido: 14/5/14 Aceptado: 6/2/15 |
Contenido : |
RESUMEN:
El objetivo del trabajo fue desarrollar una metodología para el procesamiento de información de una chacra de arroz generada con monitores de rendimiento; y su posterior utilización como punto de partida a un manejo sitio-específico. Se cuantificó y caracterizó la variabilidad espacio-temporal de los datos relevados durante dos campañas en una chacra comercial de arroz de 100 ha. Se estudió el efecto de los factores de manejo agronómico y la distribución espacial de las propiedades del suelo como causas de la variabilidad espacial del rendimiento. Además se realizó un análisis económico a partir de mapas de ingreso neto. El análisis de conglomerado identificó dos grupos de rendimiento contrastantes. Asociados a ellos, se encontraron diferencias en el contenido de arena y fósforo del suelo y diferencias en la implantación, lámina de agua y control de malezas. El análisis económico reveló que la zona de bajo rendimiento presentó pérdidas promedio de 361 dólares americanos ha-1 y la zona de alto rendimiento dio ganancias promedio de 280 dólares ha-1. El estudio demostró que las tecnologías asociadas a la agricultura de precisión permiten el análisis de la variabilidad espacial del rendimiento en chacras cuyos cultivos parecen uniformes. Se identificaron dos grupos de rendimiento contrastantes, los cuales podrían verse beneficiados con un manejo sitio-específico. La simple transformación de los datos del monitor de rendimiento en un mapa de ingreso neto se constituyó en una herramienta muy útil a la hora de tomar las decisiones acerca de potenciales estrategias para el manejo
sitio específico de esta chacra.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.
SUMMARY.
The objective of this study was to develop a methodology for processing information from a rice field generated by yield monitors; and its subsequent use as a starting point to a site-specific management. The spatiotemporal variability of the yield monitor data relayed for two years in a commercial rice field of 100 ha was quantified and characterized. The effect of agronomy management factors and the spatial distribution of soil properties as the causes of the yield spatial variability were explored. Besides, an economic analysis with maps of net income was performed. The cluster analysis identified two zones of contrasting yield. Associated with them, differences in sand content, soil phosphorus, plant emergence, water depth, and weed control were found. The economic analysis showed that the low-yield zone presented average losses of 361 American dollars ha-1 and
the high yield zone had average earnings of 280 dollars ha-1. Our study demonstrates that the technologies associated with precision agriculture allow the analysis of the yield spatial variability in fields that a first glance seem uniform. Two yield zones, which potentially could benefit from site-specific management, were identified. The simple data transformation of the yield data on a map of net income constitutes a very useful tool to make decisions about the potential strategies of site-specific management on this farm. MenosRESUMEN:
El objetivo del trabajo fue desarrollar una metodología para el procesamiento de información de una chacra de arroz generada con monitores de rendimiento; y su posterior utilización como punto de partida a un manejo sitio-específico. Se cuantificó y caracterizó la variabilidad espacio-temporal de los datos relevados durante dos campañas en una chacra comercial de arroz de 100 ha. Se estudió el efecto de los factores de manejo agronómico y la distribución espacial de las propiedades del suelo como causas de la variabilidad espacial del rendimiento. Además se realizó un análisis económico a partir de mapas de ingreso neto. El análisis de conglomerado identificó dos grupos de rendimiento contrastantes. Asociados a ellos, se encontraron diferencias en el contenido de arena y fósforo del suelo y diferencias en la implantación, lámina de agua y control de malezas. El análisis económico reveló que la zona de bajo rendimiento presentó pérdidas promedio de 361 dólares americanos ha-1 y la zona de alto rendimiento dio ganancias promedio de 280 dólares ha-1. El estudio demostró que las tecnologías asociadas a la agricultura de precisión permiten el análisis de la variabilidad espacial del rendimiento en chacras cuyos cultivos parecen uniformes. Se identificaron dos grupos de rendimiento contrastantes, los cuales podrían verse beneficiados con un manejo sitio-específico. La simple transformación de los datos del monitor de rendimiento en un mapa de ingreso neto se constituyó en... Presentar Todo |
Palabras claves : |
ANÁLISIS DE CONGLOMERADOS; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; ECONOMIC ANALYSIS; MANEJO SITIO-ESPECÍFICO; MONITORES DE RENDIMIENTO; SITE-SPECIFIC MANAGEMENT; YIELD MONITORS. |
Thesagro : |
AGRICULTURA DE PRECISION; ANÁLISIS ECONÓMICO; ARROZ; URUGUAY. |
Asunto categoría : |
F01 Cultivo |
URL : |
http://www.ainfo.inia.uy/digital/bitstream/item/13334/1/Agrociencia-Terra-arb-2015-1.pdf
|
Marc : |
LEADER 04128naa a2200313 a 4500 001 1053227 005 2021-03-10 008 2015 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 022 $a1510-0830 100 1 $aBONILLA, C. 245 $aCosechando los beneficios de la agricultura de precisión en un cultivo de arroz en Uruguay. (Harvesting the Benefits of Precision Agriculture in an Uruguayan Rice Crop) 260 $c2015 500 $aHistoria del artículo: Recibido: 14/5/14 Aceptado: 6/2/15 520 $aRESUMEN: El objetivo del trabajo fue desarrollar una metodología para el procesamiento de información de una chacra de arroz generada con monitores de rendimiento; y su posterior utilización como punto de partida a un manejo sitio-específico. Se cuantificó y caracterizó la variabilidad espacio-temporal de los datos relevados durante dos campañas en una chacra comercial de arroz de 100 ha. Se estudió el efecto de los factores de manejo agronómico y la distribución espacial de las propiedades del suelo como causas de la variabilidad espacial del rendimiento. Además se realizó un análisis económico a partir de mapas de ingreso neto. El análisis de conglomerado identificó dos grupos de rendimiento contrastantes. Asociados a ellos, se encontraron diferencias en el contenido de arena y fósforo del suelo y diferencias en la implantación, lámina de agua y control de malezas. El análisis económico reveló que la zona de bajo rendimiento presentó pérdidas promedio de 361 dólares americanos ha-1 y la zona de alto rendimiento dio ganancias promedio de 280 dólares ha-1. El estudio demostró que las tecnologías asociadas a la agricultura de precisión permiten el análisis de la variabilidad espacial del rendimiento en chacras cuyos cultivos parecen uniformes. Se identificaron dos grupos de rendimiento contrastantes, los cuales podrían verse beneficiados con un manejo sitio-específico. La simple transformación de los datos del monitor de rendimiento en un mapa de ingreso neto se constituyó en una herramienta muy útil a la hora de tomar las decisiones acerca de potenciales estrategias para el manejo sitio específico de esta chacra.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-. SUMMARY. The objective of this study was to develop a methodology for processing information from a rice field generated by yield monitors; and its subsequent use as a starting point to a site-specific management. The spatiotemporal variability of the yield monitor data relayed for two years in a commercial rice field of 100 ha was quantified and characterized. The effect of agronomy management factors and the spatial distribution of soil properties as the causes of the yield spatial variability were explored. Besides, an economic analysis with maps of net income was performed. The cluster analysis identified two zones of contrasting yield. Associated with them, differences in sand content, soil phosphorus, plant emergence, water depth, and weed control were found. The economic analysis showed that the low-yield zone presented average losses of 361 American dollars ha-1 and the high yield zone had average earnings of 280 dollars ha-1. Our study demonstrates that the technologies associated with precision agriculture allow the analysis of the yield spatial variability in fields that a first glance seem uniform. Two yield zones, which potentially could benefit from site-specific management, were identified. The simple data transformation of the yield data on a map of net income constitutes a very useful tool to make decisions about the potential strategies of site-specific management on this farm. 650 $aAGRICULTURA DE PRECISION 650 $aANÁLISIS ECONÓMICO 650 $aARROZ 650 $aURUGUAY 653 $aANÁLISIS DE CONGLOMERADOS 653 $aCLUSTER ANALYSIS 653 $aECONOMIC ANALYSIS 653 $aMANEJO SITIO-ESPECÍFICO 653 $aMONITORES DE RENDIMIENTO 653 $aSITE-SPECIFIC MANAGEMENT 653 $aYIELD MONITORS 700 1 $aTERRA, J.A. 700 1 $aGUTIERREZ, L. 700 1 $aROEL, A. 773 $tAgrociencia Uruguay, 2015$gv.19, no.1, p. 112-121.
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
Registro original : |
INIA Tacuarembó (TBO) |
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
Expresión de búsqueda válido. Check! |
|
|